Tuesday, October 04, 2011


Putting Two and Two Together

Here is an account by young Ben Shapiro about what the real reason was for Operation Fast and Furious (and a "straight" report on if from CBS).

Mr. Shapiro writes:

According to the Congressional report, "ATFs Phoenix Field Division began allowing suspects to walk away with illegally purchased guns .... This shift in strategy was known and authorized at the highest levels of the Justice Department." One goal was to identify "straw purchasers" -- legal gun purchasers who hand off those guns to illegal owners. Instead of arresting the straw purchasers and their contacts, however, ATF was to allow the guns to continue to flow to the Mexican drug cartels. "ATF and DOJ leadership were interested in seeing where these guns would ultimately end up," the report states. "ATF would only see these guns again after they turned up at a crime scene."

That's exactly what happened. The entire operation ended with only 20 indictments of straw purchasers -- indictments that could have happened immediately upon transfer of the weapons, stopping the flow. In fact, the straw purchasers, at issue, were known to be straw purchasers from the get-go. The indictments only took place at all because U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was murdered using the weapons authorized for free flow by ATF and DOJ. Terry wasn't the only person killed because of Fast and Furious -- the weapons OK'd by the DOJ and ATF were used in three murders, four kidnappings and an attempted murder in Mexico. They've been identified at 11 other crime scenes in the United States.

So what was the real goal of the DOJ and ATF? It certainly wasn't to shut down access to arms for the cartels -- the ATF was agreeing to such access. It wasn't to stop straw purchasers -- the ATF was signing off on the straw purchasers. It wasn't to track the movements of the cartel -- there was no way to do that. It was, very simply, to establish for political reasons that American guns were being used in crimes by foreign cartels.

This was the Reichstag fire of the Second Amendment. By authorizing the passage of weapons to America's enemies, President Obama and his administration clearly wanted to set up a narrative that America's lax gun laws were killing American troops and law enforcement officers. They wanted their misuse of law enforcement authority to create the impetus for a crackdown on gun sales in the United States.

Now here is a report from May of this year:

On March 30, the 30th anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady, who sustained a debilitating head wound in the attack, and his wife, Sarah, came to Capitol Hill to push for a ban on the controversial "large magazines." Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney. During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, "to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda," she said.

"I just want you to know that we are working on it," Brady recalled the president telling them. "We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar."

(emphasis added).

What's that phrase? oh, yeah, What did the President know and when did he know it? God, I miss those dark, dark days of Watergate which resulted in death and injury to zero people. So far the death toll for this idiotic scheme by the BATFE, etc., includes several Americans, some in law enforcement and an unknown amount of murdered Mexican citizens. Of course, Watergate was much more important, a clear and present danger to the viability of our Constitutional Republic as a nations of laws, not men.


I doubt that they would be able to stick Obama with knowledge of F&F (unless he's more stupid than %hit & has left an incriminating email lying around), but Holder, man, Holder just HAS to go.

He's a one-man disaster at Justice. When I read posts about him by von Spakovsky or McCarthy, I cannot believe that Holder has lasted this long.

And, really, can you think of one person in Obama's cabinet who hasn't demonstrated incredible incompetence and/or gross mismanagement? And that includes in the top three on the list, our very own Salazar, who has made a mess of Interior, and has probably done more economic damage than any two others put together. OTOH, maybe he was only well-serving his master.

Crap. It's so depressing.
Couldn't agree more on Holder and Salazar. Now let's talk about Obama: There are 3 possibilities--1) The Conversation reported didn't take place; 2) Obama meant something else was 'under the radar' than Fast and Furious; 3) He meant Fast and Furious was 'under the radar' to allow additional federal gun control legislation. I think the first has a very low probability. Regarding #2, if there is something else out there, I am not aware of it. So #3...

I think it unnecessary to remind you that they never got a memo or tape of Nixon ordering the Watergate break-in, but he left office in disgrace none the less. It all may go away either because the fire wall the press builds to protect Democrats and particularly Obama is too strong or he gets voted out and there's no point in pursuing it. Still, a man can dream, can't he?
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?