Friday, November 20, 2009

 

This Could Be Big or Nothing

There is no doubt that someone hacked a computer server at East Anglia University which is associated with Hadley Climate Research Unit (HadCRU), and released thousands of old e-mails to and from the HadCRU scientists. If the e-mails are accurate (that is, not created or enhanced by the hackers, and it's beginning to look like they're real) the Warmie true believers have been conspiring to purposefully perpetrate a fraud, one ot the biggest and most pernicious scientific frauds in history. Here, via Climate Depot, are a bunch of the e-mails with appropriate highlighting and comments in a constantly updated newspaper report. Here is what Anthony Watt has to say. And here is what Warmie Central, Real Climate, admits (as its contributors attempt to start damage control). Notice that there are no comments on the Real Climate site regarding the hacking. That means they haven't allowed any there on this issue, as they usually have at least a few hundred or so. What's up with the no comment decision?

To paraphrase George C. Scott in Strangelove: Mr. President, I'm beginning to smell a big, fat Warmie rat.

Labels:


Wednesday, November 18, 2009

 

Thought of the Day

This is how "diversity" works in practice: Intellectual contention is drowned out in a sea of emotion, much of it phony. Members of designated victim groups respond to a serious argument with "pain" and "shock" and accusations of "hate," and university administrators make a show of pretending to care.

James Taranto, showing, as he says, how Sandra Day O'Connor and the slower of the Justices were played for fools by the University of Michigan in Grutter v. Bollinger

Labels:


 

Institutionalized Judicial Misconduct

The Appellate Courts in Colorado are moving out of their slightly old, but terribly ugly offices and courtrooms and into the new superjail/courthouse being built just west of the Mint in downtown Denver. There's a slight fly in the ointment--the new space is not ready and won't be for about a third of a decade. What to do? Because of the collapse of the readership of newspapers in this state, the Rocky Mountain News went under and the Denver Post is holding on by its metaphorical fingernails (its weekday classified ads section is often just one broadsheet long). And there are two newspaper office buildings although there is only one paper still operating. So the Colorado Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Colorado has agreed to rent temporary space from the Post. Problem solved.

Oh, there might be one problem still. The paper is supposed to be the watchdog of the government, including the Judiciary--are they going to be hard (tough but fair) on their tenant? Is there a conflict of interest in the top of the Colorado Judiciary having the only big daily paper left in the state as a landlord?

Here is part of Canon 2 of the Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct, titled, A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All the Judge's Activities:

A judge should...conduct himself or herself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
I'm a member of the public and I think this deal stinks. I think our state's appellate judges are apt to be less impartial to their landlord and there certainly is the appearance of a conflict of interest even if the individual judges and justices can rise above the taint of this deal and act impartially.

I don't think I'm alone in this judgment.

(h/t Carol Chambers)

Labels:


Saturday, November 14, 2009

 

Unmitigated Disaster

The Obama Administration's decision, announced yesterday by Attorney General Eric Holder, to import captured foreign nationals into New York city for criminal trials for so called war crimes is as stupid as it is pointless. Andy McCarthy is the expert here and he's against it, as is former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, the judge at one of the only truly successful trial of murderous Islamic terrorists at which McCarthy was the prosecutor.

Here is the biggest of a long list of problems with it--discovery. The defense gets to get things the government has and which it wishes to keep secret, if there is the outside chance that it might help the defense, like how they captured Kalid Sheik Mohammed, or who the operative was who tipped off authorities before the capture. The list of bad things we have to turn over to the terrorists is nearly endless.

This is the single stupidest thing the Obama Administration has done and the individuals in this administration have done some doozies.

I have been opposed to criminal trials regarding war related incidents for a long time.

Labels:


 

Photos That Make Me Laugh

Labels:


Wednesday, November 11, 2009

 

A Veterans Day Salute


General of the Army (5 star) Douglas MacArthur leaving my dad's ship, the USS Buchanan (DD 484) and re-entering Japan after he had taken Japan's surrender out on the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2, 1945. He seems to have suffered from womanly hips, poor guy.
He started slow in WWII but finished strong. He also set Japan on the right post-war path and then utterly defeated the North Koreans south of the 38th parallel in 1950. Things got fubared after that.
We give a salute to all our veterans and our thanks.

Labels:


 

This Could Be Real

A collapse of ice last July reveals what looks like a woman's face weeping, trapped in the Austfonna ice cap located on Nordaustlandet in the Svalbard archipelago way, way north of Norway.

Labels:


Tuesday, November 10, 2009

 

Our Current General McClellan

The Army Chief of Staff, General (4 stars) George Casey, Jr., has risen above the chaff of his current office's obscurity to be detected on the radar of several people dismayed by his poor performance this century and his recent idiocy on TV. Let's take a look at the former first.

Casey, an armored forces commander, a tank guy, was senior coalition commander in Iraq from June 2004 to February 2007, the dark days of the Iraq war. He replaced three star Ricardo Sanchez and about every thing he did after that was wrong. Rather than conduct a proper counter-insurgency, he holed up his forces in huge bases and waited for the populace and Iraqi forces to provide him with the actionable intelligence he needed to go kill terrorists. It never came, mainly because it was very dangerous under those circumstances to co-operate with the Iraqi forces or with us. So we frittered away years and thousands of American soldiers' bodies and lives (usually to IEDs) as the al Askari Mosque in Samara was bombed and Iraq slouched towards a full civil war. Casey opposed the so-called surge change in tactics proposed by Generals Keane and Petraeus, et al., the latter of which generals replaced him, thank the Lord, and won the war that Casey was blowing big time. Casey was apparently a constant thorn in the side of President Bush, who ultimately had to kick him upstairs where it was thought that he could do no real damage. Fat freakin' chance.

Here is part of what Casey said in response to questions about the alleged traitorous murders of fellow soldiers at Fort Hood by alleged Muslim extremist Major Hasan (I don't know why I keep writing "alleged"--whom am I kidding?):

I’m concerned that this increased speculation could cause a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers. And I’ve asked our Army leaders to be on the lookout for that.
[...]
Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.
Again, let's take the first, first. What freakin' backlash? Mona Charen nails the old and getting older calumny here. I'm sorry, were Muslim soldiers the victims here or were American soldiers the victim of a Muslim? It's difficult to tell sometimes.

As to the latter, the 'diversity über alles' shibboleth, is this really what this loser thinks? Perhaps in the specific case of one soldier shooting his fellow soldiers, we're carrying the big tent thing a bit too far. As Mark Steyn writes:

General Casey has a point: An army that lets you check either the "home team" or "enemy" box according to taste is certainly diverse.
But I think we want our soldiers defending their comrades in arms and shooting the enemy not the other way around. It is the elevation of "diversity" over plain old common sense, which kept Major Hasan on an Army base and promoted him, when any rational leadership would have at least kicked him out of the Army, if not brought him up on charges (sedition, anyone? Bueller? Bueller?).

There is no evidence in his background and history that General George Casey, Jr. has any ability other than to rise through the ranks. He should be invited to resign.

I'm reminded of an old joke from the Vietnam War (paraphrased here): What's the difference between the Boy Scouts and the Army?

The Boy Scouts have adult leadership.

Labels: ,


Monday, November 09, 2009

 

Thought of the Day

The Democrats can’t afford to pull a conference committee switcheroo here, either. If the Senate passes a bill without a public option and a conference committee puts it back in (while stripping the Stupak amendment), it will get filibustered with the assistance of Lieberman and perhaps a handful of red-state Democrats. That will be especially true if the conference report comes back in 2010, an election year in which Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and others will have to explain themselves to center-right voters.

But what happens if a conference report comes back without a public option, and with the Stupak amendment intact? Pelosi won’t have enough votes to support it in the House, either. What can’t pass the House is the only option to pass the Senate, and vice versa. The LA Times understands the conundrum facing Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill, even if Reid and Pelosi don’t — or don’t want to admit it.

Cap'n Ed Morrissey, putting about the best spin possible on the horror last Saturday night

Labels:


 

Using the Wrong Pistol

Before I get to Major Hasan "going Muslim" I have to take a minute for a cartridge lecture. We pretty much reached the point where firearm ammunition got as good as it gets last century and, in some instances, just before last century. There has always been a distinction between pistol ammunition (generally good out to 50 yards) and rifle ammunition (good out to 1,000 yards or more with a skilled shooter). In 1943, the Germans made a third category of cartridges relevant which was in the mid range between pistol and a full sized hunting, or military, rifle cartridges, which I will call assault ammunition (good out to 400 yards, which is about the range where soldiers other than snipers actually start shooting at the enemy).

There has always been another distinction between big heavy bullets going relatively slowly and little bitty bullets going very fast. In pistol ammunition, the fast ones, the .38 Super, for example, send a 130 grain bullet out the barrel at 1,215 feet per second, and the Tokarev 7.62 x 25mm sends an 85 grain bullet out at 1,700 feet per second--that's fast. The .40 S&W, on the other hand, sends a 180 grain bullet out the barrel at 1,150 feet per second (and a 200 grain at 985 fps). The venerable .45 ACP sends a 185 grain bullet out at 1,085 fps (and a 230 grain at 830 fps). Both of those are slower than the .38 Super or Tokarev, but where the small, fast round sometimes passes completely through the body of the enemy with a very narrow wound channel (think ice pick), the slower rounds put much more of the bullet's foot pounds of energy into the enemy's body with a wide wound channel (think sledge hammer); and often the slower round knocks the enemy down while the faster round leaves him standing. The most successful full size military rifle rounds do what big, slower pistol rounds do; they all go about 2,400 feet per second, and, with weights of bullets between 180 and 220 grains, they can both knock down, and blow off small pieces of, the enemy's body. There are also rifle rounds for varmints, like prairie dogs, which have a little bullet between 40 and 60 grains going out the barrel over 3,200 feet per second. A few of these varmint rounds come out the barrel just over 4,000 feet per second. That's really fast and we won't beat that for quite a while, not that we really want to. When these super fast, small rounds hit the prairie dog, for example, the target more or less explodes in a pink mist; but they are not as damaging to a human sized target. Just like the fast little pistol rounds, the wound channel from the fast little rifle bullets is small and the enemy is not always knocked down when hit.

There was just this sort of small/fast versus slow/large divide in the assault cartridges. The Germans kept the full sized 8mm rifle bullet (actually 7.92mm) but used a short cartridge which of course held less propellant so that the bullet went slower and less far. Thus the STG 43 (et al.) weapon (the first effective, mass produced assault rifle) used a 7.92 x 33mm round (aka 8mm kurz). The Soviets kept the same idea when they sorta copied the STG 43 and called it the AK 47. The assault round they developed was the 7.62 x 39mm (as opposed to their full sized, 7.62 x 54mmR rifle round). We Americans went varmint instead. Mr. Stoner used, for the AR -15 and then the M-16 and its progeny, a slightly changed .223 Remington round (a 40 to 60 grain .22 bullet that comes out the barrel at about 3,200 feet per second). The NATO version is designated 5.65 x 45mm. I have long thought that it was a mistake to go varmint. I think we should try to kill the enemy rather than merely wound him--knock them down so that they can't still shoot at you just after being hit--but no one listens to me.

OK, the cartridge shrinking process has repeated regarding some products of the Fabrique Nationale, which is a very good Belgium firearms manufacturer. They have taken the NATO .223 round and shrunk its casing and removed propellant to make an even more underpowered assault round, the 5.7 x 28mm. They put this in the FN P90 (the weapon they used in the latter years of the original Stargate series) and recently in a pistol, named the FN Five seveN, (styling name with the capitol FN repeated) which is the gun Maj. Hasan actually fired last week. Sorry it took so long to get to the subject.

Although the extremist terrorist got off perhaps as many as 100 rounds out of his post-modern pistol, and he hit a lot of people (43), he only killed 13. Had he hit that many with .40 S&W rounds, for example, I firmly believe, the death count would be higher and perhaps he would have come out of the firefight with police officers--Sgt. Mark Todd and Sgt. Kimberly Munley--the winner, as he hit her, perhaps all three times, with his relatively puny weapon before she, and perhaps Sgt. Todd, hit him with their 9mm Berettas, another underpowered weapon in my book. Hasan was hit with four 9mm rounds and he's still alive. Need I say more?

The media is all over the gun Hasan used, calling it a cop-killer. It is not (although if you used steel core bullets (only available to a few, not including civilians nor even Major Hasan) rather than lead core bullets, it might penetrate most body armor). The pistol Hasan shot is a wrong turn on a lane which was already a wrong turn, and perhaps more American soldiers are alive today because of Hasan's snazzy, but stupid, choice.

(h/t Bob Owens)

Labels:


Sunday, November 08, 2009

 

Thought of the Day

The gay community is trying to usurp the word “marriage” without considering less antagonistic ways to attain the same goal (full legal rights). What the advantages might be - for them - in keeping the ideal of traditional marriage intact (most gay people are themselves products of heterosexual nuclear families) never even registers on their gaydar.

Charles Winecoff

Labels:


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?