Sunday, April 06, 2008

 

A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Small Minds

Here, in its entirety, is the latest from Welshman Dafydd at Big Lizards blog, just because it would be a crime to leave out a word of it:

Let me see if I have the sequence of Democratic electoral argument straight...


1992: "Don't vote for the World War II combat veteran who was shot down; war is
immoral! Vote for the moral, draft dodging peace protester."

1996: "Don't vote for the World War II combat veteran who was shot up; war is immoral! Vote for the moral, draft dodging peace protester who has led us into wars unrelated to American national security."

2000: "Don't vote for the draft-avoiding non-veteran; he's a chickenhawk! Vote for the combat-reporting veteran. Only a military veteran understands how to be Commander in Chief."

2004: "Don't vote for the draft-avoiding non-veteran; he's a chickenhawk! Vote for the combat veteran with a chest full of medals. Only a heavily decorated military veteran understands how to be Commander in Chief."

2008: "Don't vote for the Navy-brat Vietnam combat veteran who was shot down and held as a POW for five and a half years, served with distinction for more years after his return, is heavily decorated, and who has had three children in either the Navy or Marines in combat positions; the Vietnam and Iraq wars were immoral! Vote for either the wife of the moral, draft-dodging peace protester or the cocaine-abusing "community activist" -- you can't be Commander in Chief if you're too close to the military."


Have I got this about right, or did I miss something (as usual)?

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?