Thursday, September 20, 2007


Dan Rather Seems Hungry for More Abuse

Disgraced 'reporter' and former newsreader Dan Rather has sued his old employer for... for something related to his being led to pasture after he hawked patently false documents in an attempt to destroy the President's name and cost him re-election. Bill Dyer, a Texas lawyer of no small expertise, takes the claims apart even before the ink on the complaint was fully dry.

Best lines:

Rather's lawyers allege a claim for breach of contract based on an oral understanding for a contract extension that, by their own admission, was never consummated and never reduced to writing. They ignore what I'm quite sure will be a devastating waiver/estoppel counter-argument by CBS that Rather kept cashing his paychecks for many months until he finally left the network a few months before the scheduled expiration of his written contract. [See revision note below.] They allege that CBS was Rather's "fiduciary" — and I'm sorry, but that's so badly wrong as a matter of law that every one of the Sonnenschien lawyers whose name appears on this complaint ought to be sanctioned for making it (because when it comes to negotiating extensions of your employment contract, your employer is not your fiduciary but your adversary). Their tort claims against the CBS execs in their individual capacity don't even attempt to allege facts to show that they were acting outside their corporate employment capacities — making those another set of claims that are, in my judgment, so wrong as a matter of law as to be sanctionable. And the fraud claims consist of all the other claims repackaged along with an allegation that the defendants' bad acts were deliberate, and that the defendants fooled poor ol' Dan about their true and truly evil intentions for a really long time.

Labels: ,

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?