Saturday, July 16, 2005
Plame, etc.
This is interesting from lefty site Eschaton:
George Freeman, an assistant general counsel of The New York Times Company, re-affirmed that Miller would not say who that source was. "She has never received," Freeman told Liptak, "what she considers an unambiguous, unequivocal and uncoerced waiver from anyone with whom she may have spoken."
Well, has she received a waiver from her source(s) that she considers ambiguous, equivocal and coerced?
This complicates the thought problem of figuring out who her source was by logic and elimination. We had said it can't be Rove because Rove released the journalists he spoke to and Cooper based on that release testified. Maybe Miller is just being really picky. I continue to think the story has collapsed and only the uninformed remain enthusiastic about Rove's pending indictment/firing. Never happen.
George Freeman, an assistant general counsel of The New York Times Company, re-affirmed that Miller would not say who that source was. "She has never received," Freeman told Liptak, "what she considers an unambiguous, unequivocal and uncoerced waiver from anyone with whom she may have spoken."
Well, has she received a waiver from her source(s) that she considers ambiguous, equivocal and coerced?
This complicates the thought problem of figuring out who her source was by logic and elimination. We had said it can't be Rove because Rove released the journalists he spoke to and Cooper based on that release testified. Maybe Miller is just being really picky. I continue to think the story has collapsed and only the uninformed remain enthusiastic about Rove's pending indictment/firing. Never happen.
# posted by Roger Fraley @ 7:54 AM 
