Wednesday, October 23, 2013
A Real Birth Certificate vs. An Obama Birth Certificate
I'm almost certain that the President was born in Hawaii, although I do think he's lied about where he was born in the past. I don't need to see his birth certificate to answer the question of where was he born. I'm just curious and I'm made even more curious by my inability to get the information. What's he hiding? For many, it's the media black-out over his past and past lies (and current lies) that bugs the heck out of them. For our normal curiosity, we're listed as nuts or racists. Bite me. So the controversy has not gone away for the bulk of Americans with any interest in politics, I believe, despite the release years ago of the current form of President Obama's birth certificate. We're still curious. Let me explain with examples of my own. Here is a copy of my so called long form birth certificate, preserved through the copy technology of the early 1950s.
I thought I had lost that one (turns out my ex-wife took it with her by mistake) so, more recently, I wrote to my home state for a replacement and received this.
The new version is a "sanitized" version of the old one but printed on new technology paper. Clearly the original has a lot more information than the current form, although the current one is much more handsome an official document (although mine is a little worn).
I still want to see the President's early 1960s copy technology, so called long form birth certificate and the information it contains which the current one does not have, if any. Don't bother calling me a nut or a racist. I just want to see it because it's there (hidden).
I also want to see the President's grades (as I've recently looked at Romney's in high school; and I also know McCain's awful class rank and I previously saw President Bush's and John Kerry's grades at Yale). Part of the reason for my curiosity is that I strongly suspect the President's grades were bad and thus Obama's ability to get into good schools becomes nearly inexplicable. Nearly.
Isn't more information always better than less?
I thought I had lost that one (turns out my ex-wife took it with her by mistake) so, more recently, I wrote to my home state for a replacement and received this.
The new version is a "sanitized" version of the old one but printed on new technology paper. Clearly the original has a lot more information than the current form, although the current one is much more handsome an official document (although mine is a little worn).
I still want to see the President's early 1960s copy technology, so called long form birth certificate and the information it contains which the current one does not have, if any. Don't bother calling me a nut or a racist. I just want to see it because it's there (hidden).
I also want to see the President's grades (as I've recently looked at Romney's in high school; and I also know McCain's awful class rank and I previously saw President Bush's and John Kerry's grades at Yale). Part of the reason for my curiosity is that I strongly suspect the President's grades were bad and thus Obama's ability to get into good schools becomes nearly inexplicable. Nearly.
Isn't more information always better than less?
Labels: Birther Curiosity
